I am socialistic

It was doing time that had no guests, so today I have transferred the space to @Martuniki Secretary of Autonomic Politics of the Socialistic Group of Chamartín and Nearby Vowel of his Municipal Meeting, but for me especially: "partner tuitera”

With a little of introspective, I am thinking about being able to affirm that I was born socialistic.

Being in the nursery school of the nuns, at the beginning of the 70, they called my mother with urgency character, because before the reading of the Bible I affirmed that Abel was looking like to me an unbearable ball and that god had been tremendously unjust with Caín and that therefore I was of the Caín side … fortunately for me, my mother is also of lefts and she lacks some religious feeling therefore everything stayed in an anecdote to count softly the friends.

For my first years of life, I was considered to be a Christian, I liked this Jesus who him was taking from the rich ones to give to him to the poor, in plan Robin Hood, who was praising the love to the neighbor, non-wanting for the others what you do not want for one, but skylight, as soon as I had criterion I realized that the Church was very far of all that, that there were a few grateful stomachs and that his motto was a bundle what I say, but not what I should do and fled.

So without scarcely having conscience of it I discovered that I was socialistic, that wanted that the whole world had a necessary and indispensable minimum, that for it it was necessary to put more those that more they had, to redistribute the wealth, to respect the difference, the religious, sexual, racial difference or any other difference, not in vain at home they were calling me a lawyer of poor suits since there where there was a lost cause, an injustice, there it was me who was which Juana de Arco.

But the fact is that I realized that I was socialistic, at the beginning of the 80, when social democrat was an insult, that they it were the Germans, more lukewarm, less red, we were socialistic, scarcely we had left the Marxism, we were the descamisaos.

I realized that I was socialistic when in the year 82 the happiness shook every corner of this country, a government of the Spanish socialist party, presided by Felipe González, the biggest pleased of snakes who has never met and his left hand, Alfonso Guerra, the politician who better has handled the dialectics, that richer speech has argued at all times, that it has offered better replies to us to the concourse … so easy age of that time to be socialistic that the careerists were sticking us like flies and from those muds the muds of the 90 came, but this is another history and she will have to be counted in another occasion.

Since then I have been a Socialist, in the hard ones and in the mature ones, bearing in mind that the first elections in which I voted were those of the Generalitat in the year 91 that lost Raimon Obiols, my début as major Socialist of age could not be worse …

My worst memory as Socialist was the defeat in the personal details of 96, when Kitchen garden that had become our candidate after the cruel thing for Borrell, resigned in full votes inventory. I was in an electoral school in Tetuan, counting votes peperos mostly and bearing the teasing and laughs of the inspectors of the PP who already knew that our candidate had resigned instead of lasting this night with us, that we were giving the face for him …

We had to wait 8 longest years to feel the emotion, the immense happiness again of a Socialistic President to see in the Moncloa, and although the circumstances were not for many holiday and ZP sent us for house with a hug, in my house it covered the champaign and a few days later, during the Investiture meeting, I received a SMS of my brother of Brussels who was saying, I hear the nicest speech of investiture that has never heard a president in Spain.

And now what? Since now we are spending a world crisis of unsuspected proportions, we have difficulties to coordinate us, to make to come our message to the voters, but we keep on doing lefts politics, all the social services are supported, rights of the workpeople do not stand out, the idle ones are helped, he competes for the entrepreneurs, the Law of the Abortion reforms to give to the women the power on his body, he competes for the Education, for the Investigation … in a word, we keep on being Socialists.

If, I was born socialistic and I will die socialistic.

Fundamental right to Internet

According to a survey for the BBC one extends majority agrees in that Internet is considered to be a fundamental right.

I dress in the blog of Chile Logela

In Finland from October, 2009 this right is included in the Constitution. And although from here we look at them with envy, it is not that far. From January, 2011 all the citizens will have right to Internet at a gentle minimal speed of one.

In our country the access to Internet will be a universal service, as it it is for example the télefono, what it guarantees to all the citizens who request it, independently from his geographical location, a guaranteed quality and at an accessible price.

Certainly, if we have to advance towards a fundamental right, as it it is for example the right to information, we are in the good way

I recommend to you the post of Chile Logela

What It has to Govern

I defend the Public School. And I did not like anything that in parla a school coordinated in public soil was done and less for the “symbolic value” that parla has for the Socialists of Madrid. But I did not say anything, and not for party discipline, if not why I understand that sometimes to govern implies transferring some things to the advantage of the social benefit.

And that's why, often I envy the partners of IU who can say what they want in his programs knowing that they are not going to have to put it into practice in his governments. But in Rivas they govern. And now, all those who took the hands to the head for the compound parla school, meet that in Rivas are going to do the same.

I suppose that it is the ideological toll that it is necessary to pay when it is governed.

And Javi was saying:

And which is the problem, apart from the clear detriment of public resources for private business?. Since that farewell confrontation of speeches with Hope Aguirre, because if the politics that should to us differ from this right is going to be the same, perhaps someone could think correctly that the persons from Madrid should prefer the original to the bad copies, position that to do the same that the right and to propose the same as the right (do they remember of that thing about the patrimony tax?), the persons from Madrid have decided to vote to the right.

And now Javi: what do we do?

Sex and infidelity

East is the tenth post of a few conversations that we have called an Air Bridge (conversations 2.0 on sexuality that Carme Sánchez and I we capture weekly in our blogs. This time not only we have incorporated questions that tuiteros and tuiteras they have left in a Google Docs but the topic was chosen by means of a question opened for the munto twitter)

The whole life can one be faithful?

The sexual loyalty is an agreement to which a couple comes. And as there are persons who fulfill an agreement also them there is that not … The problem is that neither this agreement generally not explicit as such and it defines specifically the agreement what provokes in the long run misunderstandings and problems.
The agreement not explicit because at the beginning of the relation it gives objection and later little taboo turns into a topic or is considered understood, although sometimes every member of the couple gives of course slightly different agreements from the agreement with regard to the proper loyalty with regard to the couple or of the loyalty of other or of other one (that one typical that one justifies his infidelities like minors, but he feels teriblemente hurt or hurt for the infidelity of the couple)

Many people justify the infidelity in the sex, in which he looks out of his couple for what it does not have: Is it the determinant sex at the time of which a couple is faithful?

The sexuality is an important aspect of the relation of couple but if a couple only has problems in the sexual relation it usually tries to solve it (it is evident very much when a couple consults for a sexual problems, but there is a good affective and emotional relation and desire of solving it on both parts). The problem is when different motives and causes are mixed …

I could have observed that many persons do not value the sufficient thing to his couple, on the contrary they finish only seeing the negative part (that certainly we all and all have) and nothing positive … for what then any person who happens ahead and to that for “had just known” only they appreciate the good thing to him … In therapy we use strategies so that two members meet again again in a more positive ambience and looking with one at less critical glasses for other or other one.

Is the loyalty a cultural question?

The anthropological theories are curious on this matter, but I believe that by influence androcéntrica … generally the loyalty is more valued for the woman that that of the man. Even some genital mutilations justify under the premise of which the woman does not think about how to please out of the couple … In the men the infidelity it has justified itself for the centuries of the centuries (in certain epochs the sons and daughters illegitimate of the men were enjoying certain privileges). In the literature, the unfaithful women have had generalmenteun final tragic actor (Madame Bovary, …) to serve like example of what a good woman must not do …

What are you an unbeliever it means that you do not love your couple?

It depends on the type of infidelity … there are punctual infidelities that do not have porqué to reverberate in the life of the couple, any time there is not practised the "sincericidio" (it mixes to equal parts of sincerity and suicide) … but when parallel relations are supported that already complicates more feelings with regard to the "official" couple and the "semiofficial one" … Although the determinant thing in these cases there is the existence of children and/or daughters (for supporting an appearance of respectable and local family) or the economic resources that some of the members can lose.

For every 20 votes the PP …

I know it. Who is in charge me to me read the Hazteoir blogosfera. But good, one finds surprises. Were not these friends of the PP?

And you find a blog, Dret to Viure, aggregation in which as it sets For every 20 votes, a child killed the People's Party

Image of Dret to Viure

During two terms of the People's Party this one supported in force a law that allowed the murder of more than 500.000 innocent children.

During these two orders the PP received a support of approximately 10.000.000 of votes. I hope that in the next elections the people should take seriously his vote and should defend actively the life. (Dret appointment to Viure)

If these are his friends, as they will be his enemies. And I admit that I have remained without words. Only it happens to me to quote my mother and to say that thing about who goes to bed with children gets up "meao"

* I am useful to say that an atrocity looks like to me the accusation

Freedom

The lideresa gets angry with Bos é for comparing Cuba with Valencia. It remains to say that it is not the same. But just as the garbs are torn and make themselves up of leaders of the freedom with Cuba they could do it with the censoring in Valencia. Are not they so liberal and so defending of the freedom? So much, that it seems that they had invented the freedom.

And of Valencia not mú.

Before the censoring, he says Hope, which is not the same to remove a few pictures than to torture prisoners. It is clear that not, it is not the same. But both are things that do the dictatorships. And that I know Spain it it is not. And Valencia neither, it is supposed.

Image of The Plural

But it is clear that it is difficult to the PP to censure the censoring in Valencia. It does not surprise me, taking as a president the Minister of Information of Franco.

The key of Madrid

A Galician (in the strict sense of the word and not the use that Rosa Díez gives him), Javier García Nuñez, who was already delegated by CDS in the Assembly of Madrid has been elected by 80 % of the votes a territorial coordinator of UpyD Madrid, although it does not have because the pink candidate for Madrid.

Javier Nuñez has served in the Socialistic Party of the Interior (PSI) and with Tender Galván in the Popular Socialistic Party (PSP). The year of his foundation affiliated to CDS. This gentleman, that he has traveled from the left to the center it is possible that it is the one that has the key of Madrid.

If UpyD enters the Assembly it will do it with approximately 6 deputies (if it extracts the minimum of 5 %) and it can be the "key". It is possible that it is that's why, that Güemes has begun doing mimitos Rosa Díez. Although I do not believe that it needs. According to the UPyD articles of association they will support to the most adopted party.

And this way, an ex-Socialist and ex-centrist one is to today who can decide the government of Madrid.